String & Racket Finder

HEAD SQUARED tennis rackets compared

Too new for independent teardowns — the current HEAD stack (an Auxetic 2.0-generation yoke and modern grommet work) is the likely story, but treat every specific claim as a claim until someone saws one open. The spec sheet above is the reliable part.

Compare these frames in the finder →

Specifications and scores

All 1 current HEAD SQUARED model, with unstrung weight, head size, string pattern, stiffness (RA), swingweight, balance and beam width, followed by the eleven playing axes rated 0–10 and a difficulty rating.

ModelWeightHeadPatternStiffnessSwingweightBalanceBeam CtrlPrecSpinPwrFeelStabManServeSmshSliceRetDiff
Squared 2026 295g10016x1861 RA~298~29523/24/23 667788108986 5

Swipe the table sideways for the remaining columns.

Axes, in order: Control (flat) · Precision · Spin · Power · Feel / comfort · Stability · Maneuverability · Serve · Smash & overhead · Slice / touch · Return / blocking. Difficulty is how demanding the frame is to use well, not how good it is.

Model notes

Squared 2026

A genuine departure rather than a refresh: a dual-tube build with an extremely head-light balance, aimed squarely at comfort and racquet-head speed instead of tour-level plow. It swings faster than its static weight suggests, prepares almost instantly, and the foam-filled construction kills harsh vibration. Expect easy spin and a high launch, and expect it to move on you against a genuinely heavy ball — it favours a softer string and a player who supplies angle rather than mass.

Choosing between them

Frames in one family share a construction story but not a playing character — head size, pattern and swingweight move the numbers above far more than the marketing does. If you want a shortlist matched to how you actually play, and a string bed matched to the frame, the finder does that in a few taps.

Related