String & Racket Finder

WILSON CLASH tennis rackets compared

The rare case where the gimmick is real and measurable. FreeFlex is a carbon mapping that lets the frame bend in planes rackets normally refuse; StableSmart is the geometry that keeps it from twisting anyway. Result: stiffness numbers in the 50s with normal stability — genuinely new when it shipped, still the arm-friendly modern benchmark.

Compare these frames in the finder →

Specifications and scores

All 4 current WILSON CLASH models, with unstrung weight, head size, string pattern, stiffness (RA), swingweight, balance and beam width, followed by the eleven playing axes rated 0–10 and a difficulty rating.

ModelWeightHeadPatternStiffnessSwingweightBalanceBeam CtrlPrecSpinPwrFeelStabManServeSmshSliceRetDiff
Clash 100 v3 295g10016x1957 RA~313~32524 76979678677 6
Clash 100 Pro v3 310g10016x1959 RA~325~32024.5 76989949879 8
Clash 98 v3 305g9816x2058 RA~318~31523.5 98669676696 6
Clash 100L v3 280g10016x1955 RA~305~33024 76979498575 3

Swipe the table sideways for the remaining columns.

Axes, in order: Control (flat) · Precision · Spin · Power · Feel / comfort · Stability · Maneuverability · Serve · Smash & overhead · Slice / touch · Return / blocking. Difficulty is how demanding the frame is to use well, not how good it is.

Choosing between them

Frames in one family share a construction story but not a playing character — head size, pattern and swingweight move the numbers above far more than the marketing does. If you want a shortlist matched to how you actually play, and a string bed matched to the frame, the finder does that in a few taps.

Related